<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/templates/default/atom.css" type="text/css" ?>

<feed 
   xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
   xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
   xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
   xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
   xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
   xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">
    <link href="http://status.tuffmail.net/feeds/atom.xml" rel="self" title="System Status &amp; Announcements - Tuffmail" type="application/atom+xml" />
    <link href="http://status.tuffmail.net/"                        rel="alternate"    title="System Status &amp; Announcements - Tuffmail" type="text/html" />
    <link href="http://status.tuffmail.net/rss.php?version=2.0"     rel="alternate"    title="System Status &amp; Announcements - Tuffmail" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <title type="html">System Status &amp; Announcements - Tuffmail</title>
    <subtitle type="html"></subtitle>
    <icon>http://status.tuffmail.net/templates/default/img/s9y_banner_small.png</icon>
    <id>http://status.tuffmail.net/</id>
    <updated>2009-07-20T23:36:01Z</updated>
    <generator uri="http://www.s9y.org/" version="1.2.1">Serendipity 1.2.1 - http://www.s9y.org/</generator>
    <dc:language>en</dc:language>

    <entry>
        <link href="http://status.tuffmail.net/archives/80-Hotmail-box-polls.html" rel="alternate" title="Hotmail box polls" />
        <author>
            <name>Support</name>
            <email>nospam@example.com</email>
        </author>
    
        <published>2009-07-20T23:36:01Z</published>
        <updated>2009-07-20T23:36:01Z</updated>
        <wfw:comment>http://status.tuffmail.net/wfwcomment.php?cid=80</wfw:comment>
    
        <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
        <wfw:commentRss>http://status.tuffmail.net/rss.php?version=atom1.0&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=80</wfw:commentRss>
    
            <category scheme="http://status.tuffmail.net/categories/2-Mxes" label="Mxes" term="Mxes" />
            <category scheme="http://status.tuffmail.net/categories/1-Tuffmail" label="Tuffmail" term="Tuffmail" />
    
        <id>http://status.tuffmail.net/archives/80-guid.html</id>
        <title type="html">Hotmail box polls</title>
        <content type="xhtml" xml:base="http://status.tuffmail.net/">
            <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
                Hotmail has announced that POP3 access is now available for all Hotmail users.
The WebDAV protocol used to access Hotmail is still working for some Hotmail accounts
but Hotmail has stated that they will discontinue WebDAV access completely.<br /><br />
If your current Hotmail poll stops working, use these settings instead of the Hotmail protocol.<br /><br />

Server: pop3.live.com<br />
Protocol: POP3<br />
Check the 'Use SSL' box<br /><br />

New Hotmail polls should use the settings above.<br />

 
            </div>
        </content>
        
    </entry>
    <entry>
        <link href="http://status.tuffmail.net/archives/79-Outbound-MX-relay-IP-addresses.html" rel="alternate" title="Outbound MX relay IP addresses" />
        <author>
            <name>Support</name>
            <email>nospam@example.com</email>
        </author>
    
        <published>2009-07-14T23:14:48Z</published>
        <updated>2009-07-14T23:14:48Z</updated>
        <wfw:comment>http://status.tuffmail.net/wfwcomment.php?cid=79</wfw:comment>
    
        <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
        <wfw:commentRss>http://status.tuffmail.net/rss.php?version=atom1.0&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=79</wfw:commentRss>
    
            <category scheme="http://status.tuffmail.net/categories/2-Mxes" label="Mxes" term="Mxes" />
            <category scheme="http://status.tuffmail.net/categories/1-Tuffmail" label="Tuffmail" term="Tuffmail" />
    
        <id>http://status.tuffmail.net/archives/79-guid.html</id>
        <title type="html">Outbound MX relay IP addresses</title>
        <content type="xhtml" xml:base="http://status.tuffmail.net/">
            <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
                Customers with MX relay accounts should be allowing the following CIDR block through their firewalls.<br /><br />
<center>216.86.168.188/30</center>
<br />
A third MX relay instance has been added and a fourth may be addded in the future.
 
            </div>
        </content>
        
    </entry>
    <entry>
        <link href="http://status.tuffmail.net/archives/77-New-SSL-Certificates.html" rel="alternate" title="New SSL Certificates" />
        <author>
            <name>Support</name>
            <email>nospam@example.com</email>
        </author>
    
        <published>2009-02-12T00:44:00Z</published>
        <updated>2009-02-12T00:44:00Z</updated>
        <wfw:comment>http://status.tuffmail.net/wfwcomment.php?cid=77</wfw:comment>
    
        <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
        <wfw:commentRss>http://status.tuffmail.net/rss.php?version=atom1.0&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=77</wfw:commentRss>
    
            <category scheme="http://status.tuffmail.net/categories/2-Mxes" label="Mxes" term="Mxes" />
            <category scheme="http://status.tuffmail.net/categories/1-Tuffmail" label="Tuffmail" term="Tuffmail" />
    
        <id>http://status.tuffmail.net/archives/77-guid.html</id>
        <title type="html">New SSL Certificates</title>
        <content type="xhtml" xml:base="http://status.tuffmail.net/">
            <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
                Over the next several days we will be replacing the SSL certifcates on all web, SMTP, IMAP, and POP3
servers.  This is being done in response to the recent publication of a possible attack on MD5 signed
SSL certificates.  The short story is that these researchers have created a CA, Certificate Authority,
signing certificate that can be used to sign end entity SSL certificates that will appear to have been
issued by the real CA.
The gory details are <a href="http://www.win.tue.nl/hashclash/rogue-ca/" title="MD5 considered harmful today">here</a>.<br /><br />

To exploit  this MD5 vulnerability requires considerable cryptography knowledge and a significant amount of
computing power to create the fake CA signing certificate.  The attacker then has to convince the victim
to connect to the fake server via DNS hijacking, social
engineering, or with phishing techniques.  Financial institutions would be the likely target should generating the
fake CA certificate actually be acomplished outside of the laboratory.







 
            </div>
        </content>
        
    </entry>
    <entry>
        <link href="http://status.tuffmail.net/archives/76-Internal-routng-problem.html" rel="alternate" title="Internal routng problem" />
        <author>
            <name>Support</name>
            <email>nospam@example.com</email>
        </author>
    
        <published>2009-02-09T15:19:40Z</published>
        <updated>2009-02-12T01:02:29Z</updated>
        <wfw:comment>http://status.tuffmail.net/wfwcomment.php?cid=76</wfw:comment>
    
        <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
        <wfw:commentRss>http://status.tuffmail.net/rss.php?version=atom1.0&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=76</wfw:commentRss>
    
            <category scheme="http://status.tuffmail.net/categories/2-Mxes" label="Mxes" term="Mxes" />
            <category scheme="http://status.tuffmail.net/categories/1-Tuffmail" label="Tuffmail" term="Tuffmail" />
    
        <id>http://status.tuffmail.net/archives/76-guid.html</id>
        <title type="html">Internal routng problem</title>
        <content type="xhtml" xml:base="http://status.tuffmail.net/">
            <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
                Apologies for the delay., its been a trying day
<br /><br />
We use the OSPF routing protocol internally to advertise the IP addresses of each service to the
border routers providing load balancing and failover. The routers were loosing OSPF adjacency and
the assumption was that
this was an OSPF bug in the
routers or in the routing daemons running on the physical servers.  OSPF bugs are not unheard of.
It appeared that the OSPF processess in the routers were consuming most the the router CPU.
<br /><br />
Much time was wasted shutting down
all OSPF daemons and adding static routes to provide access to the IMAP and SMTP servers when 
the real problem was elsewhere.  With OSPF shut down the routers were still seeing  bursts of 100%
CPU causing periods of total packet loss.
<br /><br />
The problem was isolated to to a switch in our first floor rack by disconnecting all trunks to the
first floor and to our upstreams and reconnecting one by one.  Eveything was then disconnected from
 the first floor switches
and reconnected one machine at a time and tested.  This was a time consuming process.
<br /><br />

The culprit was a  machine in our
first floor rack that was spewing packets of some sort that was driving the routers to 100% CPU.  Counters
on the switches and on the machines themselves were not out of the ordinary hiding the real problem.

<br /><br />

We have redundant routing, trunks, switches, with two Ethernet interfaces on each server.  With this
configuration, the network will survive total hardware failures but not what we experienced today.  We are not
new to routing and this is the first time a failure like this has been seen.
<br /><br />

No mail was lost.  The network being down will not cause mail to be lost (unless its an Exchange server but that's
not our problem).  SMTP is a robust queue and retry protocol.
Mail is queued untill it can be delivered to the next hop and a positive acknowledgement of receipt is received.
Its worked that way for 20 years.


<br /><br />

Webmail is now working.
<br /><br />
Mail is back up and beginning to flow - for those using IMAP desktop clients.  All other
processes should be coming online in the next few hours, if not before.

Static routes will be put in place within 40 minutes and should fix the problem
We apologize for this extremely unusual interruption.
It is a routing problem - no mail will be lost.
<br /><br />

Router reload did not fix the problem.
<br /><br />


Reloading routers now. 
            </div>
        </content>
        
    </entry>
    <entry>
        <link href="http://status.tuffmail.net/archives/75-SSL-certificate-update.html" rel="alternate" title="SSL certificate update" />
        <author>
            <name>Support</name>
            <email>nospam@example.com</email>
        </author>
    
        <published>2008-11-16T00:27:30Z</published>
        <updated>2008-11-16T00:27:30Z</updated>
        <wfw:comment>http://status.tuffmail.net/wfwcomment.php?cid=75</wfw:comment>
    
        <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
        <wfw:commentRss>http://status.tuffmail.net/rss.php?version=atom1.0&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=75</wfw:commentRss>
    
            <category scheme="http://status.tuffmail.net/categories/2-Mxes" label="Mxes" term="Mxes" />
            <category scheme="http://status.tuffmail.net/categories/1-Tuffmail" label="Tuffmail" term="Tuffmail" />
    
        <id>http://status.tuffmail.net/archives/75-guid.html</id>
        <title type="html">SSL certificate update</title>
        <content type="xhtml" xml:base="http://status.tuffmail.net/">
            <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
                Later today an updated *.mxes.net  cert will be installed on the IMAP/POP3 proxy servers and
on the customer SMTP servers.
Some mail clients will whine when the cert expiration date changes.
 
            </div>
        </content>
        
    </entry>
    <entry>
        <link href="http://status.tuffmail.net/archives/74-Ignore-email-titled-March-invoice.html" rel="alternate" title="Ignore email titled 'March invoice'" />
        <author>
            <name>Support</name>
            <email>nospam@example.com</email>
        </author>
    
        <published>2008-04-22T00:42:33Z</published>
        <updated>2008-04-22T00:42:33Z</updated>
        <wfw:comment>http://status.tuffmail.net/wfwcomment.php?cid=74</wfw:comment>
    
        <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
        <wfw:commentRss>http://status.tuffmail.net/rss.php?version=atom1.0&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=74</wfw:commentRss>
    
            <category scheme="http://status.tuffmail.net/categories/2-Mxes" label="Mxes" term="Mxes" />
            <category scheme="http://status.tuffmail.net/categories/1-Tuffmail" label="Tuffmail" term="Tuffmail" />
    
        <id>http://status.tuffmail.net/archives/74-guid.html</id>
        <title type="html">Ignore email titled 'March invoice'</title>
        <content type="xhtml" xml:base="http://status.tuffmail.net/">
            <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
                Some customers were sent an invoice notice for resellers by mistake.
Please ignore that  message if you are not a reseller. 
            </div>
        </content>
        
    </entry>
    <entry>
        <link href="http://status.tuffmail.net/archives/73-Several-machines-down.html" rel="alternate" title="Several machines down" />
        <author>
            <name>Support</name>
            <email>nospam@example.com</email>
        </author>
    
        <published>2008-04-15T04:42:19Z</published>
        <updated>2009-02-12T01:00:56Z</updated>
        <wfw:comment>http://status.tuffmail.net/wfwcomment.php?cid=73</wfw:comment>
    
        <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
        <wfw:commentRss>http://status.tuffmail.net/rss.php?version=atom1.0&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=73</wfw:commentRss>
    
            <category scheme="http://status.tuffmail.net/categories/2-Mxes" label="Mxes" term="Mxes" />
            <category scheme="http://status.tuffmail.net/categories/1-Tuffmail" label="Tuffmail" term="Tuffmail" />
    
        <id>http://status.tuffmail.net/archives/73-guid.html</id>
        <title type="html">Several machines down</title>
        <content type="xhtml" xml:base="http://status.tuffmail.net/">
            <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
                IMAP servers ms1.mxes.net and ms6.mxes.net have been switched to their replicas.
The incoming mail queues are draining.  No mail will be lost.<br />
<br />

Several IMAP servers are unreachable.  We suspect a power problem.  Services are being
switched to replicas. 
            </div>
        </content>
        
    </entry>
    <entry>
        <link href="http://status.tuffmail.net/archives/72-Mail-delay.html" rel="alternate" title="Mail delay" />
        <author>
            <name>Support</name>
            <email>nospam@example.com</email>
        </author>
    
        <published>2008-04-01T15:47:37Z</published>
        <updated>2008-04-01T15:47:37Z</updated>
        <wfw:comment>http://status.tuffmail.net/wfwcomment.php?cid=72</wfw:comment>
    
        <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
        <wfw:commentRss>http://status.tuffmail.net/rss.php?version=atom1.0&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=72</wfw:commentRss>
    
            <category scheme="http://status.tuffmail.net/categories/2-Mxes" label="Mxes" term="Mxes" />
            <category scheme="http://status.tuffmail.net/categories/1-Tuffmail" label="Tuffmail" term="Tuffmail" />
    
        <id>http://status.tuffmail.net/archives/72-guid.html</id>
        <title type="html">Mail delay</title>
        <content type="xhtml" xml:base="http://status.tuffmail.net/">
            <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
                ClamAV died on one MX server and our monitoring system failed to detect
that due to a configuration error.  A good amount of mail is queued and the
queue is draining.

This weekend we will force a failure on all systems to double check the 
monitoring system.  Its running on a new server with new software.

Sorry for the mail delay. 
            </div>
        </content>
        
    </entry>
    <entry>
        <link href="http://status.tuffmail.net/archives/71-New-status-site.html" rel="alternate" title="New status site" />
        <author>
            <name>Support</name>
            <email>nospam@example.com</email>
        </author>
    
        <published>2008-03-15T00:00:00Z</published>
        <updated>2008-03-15T00:00:00Z</updated>
        <wfw:comment>http://status.tuffmail.net/wfwcomment.php?cid=71</wfw:comment>
    
        <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
        <wfw:commentRss>http://status.tuffmail.net/rss.php?version=atom1.0&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=71</wfw:commentRss>
    
            <category scheme="http://status.tuffmail.net/categories/2-Mxes" label="Mxes" term="Mxes" />
            <category scheme="http://status.tuffmail.net/categories/1-Tuffmail" label="Tuffmail" term="Tuffmail" />
    
        <id>http://status.tuffmail.net/archives/71-guid.html</id>
        <title type="html">New status site</title>
        <content type="xhtml" xml:base="http://status.tuffmail.net/">
            <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
                This is the new status site software running on a server at <a href="http://johncompanies.com/">
johncompanies.com</a>.  This software allows us to update this site more easily and the RSS
feed will stay in sync. 
            </div>
        </content>
        
    </entry>
    <entry>
        <link href="http://status.tuffmail.net/archives/67-Wide-area-power-outage.html" rel="alternate" title="Wide area power outage" />
        <author>
            <name>Support</name>
            <email>nospam@example.com</email>
        </author>
    
        <published>2008-02-26T17:30:00Z</published>
        <updated>2008-03-14T20:06:42Z</updated>
        <wfw:comment>http://status.tuffmail.net/wfwcomment.php?cid=67</wfw:comment>
    
        <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
        <wfw:commentRss>http://status.tuffmail.net/rss.php?version=atom1.0&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=67</wfw:commentRss>
    
            <category scheme="http://status.tuffmail.net/categories/2-Mxes" label="Mxes" term="Mxes" />
            <category scheme="http://status.tuffmail.net/categories/1-Tuffmail" label="Tuffmail" term="Tuffmail" />
    
        <id>http://status.tuffmail.net/archives/67-guid.html</id>
        <title type="html">Wide area power outage</title>
        <content type="xhtml" xml:base="http://status.tuffmail.net/">
            <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
                Postmortem:  The nuke plant failure was widely reported by the mainstream media
and there is nothing to add to those reports.<br /><br />
The reason our power was affected was that one battery in the battery bank
for the third floor UPS failed before the generator could come up to speed.
The entire battery bank has been replaced.<br /><br />

Update:  LDAP server and SMTP servers are up. <br />
Update:  All IMAP servers and IMAP/POP3 muxes are up.<br />
Update:  Imap servers ms1.mxes.net and ms3.mxes.net are up.<br /><br />

Working to determine the extent of the problem.  Most services are down. 
            </div>
        </content>
        
    </entry>
    <entry>
        <link href="http://status.tuffmail.net/archives/66-Rebooting-3-IMAP-servers.html" rel="alternate" title="Rebooting 3 IMAP servers" />
        <author>
            <name>Support</name>
            <email>nospam@example.com</email>
        </author>
    
        <published>2008-01-20T20:12:00Z</published>
        <updated>2008-01-21T00:43:00Z</updated>
        <wfw:comment>http://status.tuffmail.net/wfwcomment.php?cid=66</wfw:comment>
    
        <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
        <wfw:commentRss>http://status.tuffmail.net/rss.php?version=atom1.0&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=66</wfw:commentRss>
    
            <category scheme="http://status.tuffmail.net/categories/2-Mxes" label="Mxes" term="Mxes" />
            <category scheme="http://status.tuffmail.net/categories/1-Tuffmail" label="Tuffmail" term="Tuffmail" />
    
        <id>http://status.tuffmail.net/archives/66-guid.html</id>
        <title type="html">Rebooting 3 IMAP servers</title>
        <content type="xhtml" xml:base="http://status.tuffmail.net/">
            <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
                Between 18:00 and 20:00 EST (UTC -0500) ms1.mxes.net, ms5.mxes.net,
and ms6.mxes.net will be rebooted to change a kernel parameter.
These are the scheduled reboot times.<p>

&#160; ms1.mxes.net 18:00 - Back up and accepting logins at 18:04<br />
&#160; ms5.mxes.net 18:45 - Back up and accepting logins at 18:48<br />
&#160; ms6.mxes.net 19:30 - Back up and accepting logins at 19:33<br />
<p>
Downtime for each server will be 3 to 5 minutes.  Expect IMAP
and POP3 connection failures during this maintenance period.
New mail will be queued.  No mail will be lost.<p>

We apologize for this service interruption. 
            </div>
        </content>
        
    </entry>
    <entry>
        <link href="http://status.tuffmail.net/archives/65-Unresponsive-server.html" rel="alternate" title="Unresponsive server" />
        <author>
            <name>Support</name>
            <email>nospam@example.com</email>
        </author>
    
        <published>2008-01-12T04:00:00Z</published>
        <updated>2008-01-13T19:47:39Z</updated>
        <wfw:comment>http://status.tuffmail.net/wfwcomment.php?cid=65</wfw:comment>
    
        <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
        <wfw:commentRss>http://status.tuffmail.net/rss.php?version=atom1.0&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=65</wfw:commentRss>
    
            <category scheme="http://status.tuffmail.net/categories/2-Mxes" label="Mxes" term="Mxes" />
            <category scheme="http://status.tuffmail.net/categories/1-Tuffmail" label="Tuffmail" term="Tuffmail" />
    
        <id>http://status.tuffmail.net/archives/65-guid.html</id>
        <title type="html">Unresponsive server</title>
        <content type="xhtml" xml:base="http://status.tuffmail.net/">
            <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
                At 21:35 EST (UTC -5) IMAP server ms1.mxes.net became unresponsive requiring a switch to
its replica.  The switch was complete and IMAP/POP3 access restored by 22:00 EST.  All queued
mail was delivered by 2300 EST.  No mail was lost.<p>
We apologize for this service interruption. 
            </div>
        </content>
        
    </entry>
    <entry>
        <link href="http://status.tuffmail.net/archives/64-HPCompaq-Server-Migration.html" rel="alternate" title="HP/Compaq Server Migration" />
        <author>
            <name>Support</name>
            <email>nospam@example.com</email>
        </author>
    
        <published>2008-01-01T15:20:33Z</published>
        <updated>2008-01-01T15:20:33Z</updated>
        <wfw:comment>http://status.tuffmail.net/wfwcomment.php?cid=64</wfw:comment>
    
        <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
        <wfw:commentRss>http://status.tuffmail.net/rss.php?version=atom1.0&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=64</wfw:commentRss>
    
            <category scheme="http://status.tuffmail.net/categories/2-Mxes" label="Mxes" term="Mxes" />
            <category scheme="http://status.tuffmail.net/categories/1-Tuffmail" label="Tuffmail" term="Tuffmail" />
    
        <id>http://status.tuffmail.net/archives/64-guid.html</id>
        <title type="html">HP/Compaq Server Migration</title>
        <content type="xhtml" xml:base="http://status.tuffmail.net/">
            <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
                Several months back we decided that all new machines would be
HP/Compaq and most existing machines would be upgraded to 
HP/Compaq machines.  Today we will switch customers that have   
accounts on ms1.mxes.net to its replica that has already been 
upgraded to HP/Compaq.  Later in the week or next weekend we     
will switch to the new HP/Compaq primary.<p>                               
  
The switch will take about 60 seconds and during that time 
customers on ms1.mxes.net will not be able to connect to the
IMAP or POP3 server.  No mail will be lost.<p>

And last but not least, Happy New Year! 
            </div>
        </content>
        
    </entry>
    <entry>
        <link href="http://status.tuffmail.net/archives/63-Cable-system-routing-issue.html" rel="alternate" title="Cable system routing issue" />
        <author>
            <name>Support</name>
            <email>nospam@example.com</email>
        </author>
    
        <published>2007-12-20T16:00:00Z</published>
        <updated>2007-12-20T16:17:58Z</updated>
        <wfw:comment>http://status.tuffmail.net/wfwcomment.php?cid=63</wfw:comment>
    
        <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
        <wfw:commentRss>http://status.tuffmail.net/rss.php?version=atom1.0&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=63</wfw:commentRss>
    
            <category scheme="http://status.tuffmail.net/categories/2-Mxes" label="Mxes" term="Mxes" />
            <category scheme="http://status.tuffmail.net/categories/1-Tuffmail" label="Tuffmail" term="Tuffmail" />
    
        <id>http://status.tuffmail.net/archives/63-guid.html</id>
        <title type="html">Cable system routing issue</title>
        <content type="xhtml" xml:base="http://status.tuffmail.net/">
            <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
                We have a few reports from our customers and a few from one of
our colocation customers customer of not being able to reach
our network.  The problem is very scattered and it appears to
be an AT&T problem.  All reports are from customers that are
connected to the Internet via a cable system provider.<p>

Our bandwidth and IMAP/POP3 connection rate is very normal
indicating the problem is not very widespred. 
            </div>
        </content>
        
    </entry>
    <entry>
        <link href="http://status.tuffmail.net/archives/1-Cogent-routing-issue.html" rel="alternate" title="Cogent routing issue" />
        <author>
            <name>Support</name>
            <email>nospam@example.com</email>
        </author>
    
        <published>2007-12-14T17:45:24Z</published>
        <updated>2007-12-15T20:19:16Z</updated>
        <wfw:comment>http://status.tuffmail.net/wfwcomment.php?cid=1</wfw:comment>
    
        <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
        <wfw:commentRss>http://status.tuffmail.net/rss.php?version=atom1.0&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=1</wfw:commentRss>
    
            <category scheme="http://status.tuffmail.net/categories/2-Mxes" label="Mxes" term="Mxes" />
            <category scheme="http://status.tuffmail.net/categories/1-Tuffmail" label="Tuffmail" term="Tuffmail" />
    
        <id>http://status.tuffmail.net/archives/1-guid.html</id>
        <title type="html">Cogent routing issue</title>
        <content type="xhtml" xml:base="http://status.tuffmail.net/">
            <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
                Around 1120 UTC, customers transiting through Cogent were not able to reach some of our servers for about ten minutes. This was a Cogent issue affecting many other Cogent customers. 
            </div>
        </content>
        
    </entry>

</feed>